
At the beginning of his film, W. Boote captivated me as he described the
history of plastics and the role they now played in the world trade. These
first minutes are practically unmarked by his personal biases and are charged
with information. Unfortunately, the director seems to quickly change the
structure of his documentary in its second half.
Quickly, Boote depicts all plastic-based products as the burden of
society and an overwhelming threat to global health. His narration is characterized
by one-sided comments such as “Plastic: the invisible danger.” At the same
time, W. Boote only provides short insights of experiments conducted by
independent researchers on plastic’s toxicity. In fact, most arguments in Plastic Planet are illustrated
superficially. Scenes such as the short shots of a plastic-mummification
company leave viewers disappointed and confused.
Though he might be facing convincing evidence that proves his theory, I
think Werner Boote didn’t make the most convincing choice. I suspect an
objective film presenting the tests conducted by both parties would have better
supported his claims.
Among the documentaries we have seen so far, Werner Boote's Plastic
Planet disappointed me the most. At first I was fascinated by the focus of
the film, the importance and potential threats of plastics in our consumer
societies. However, Boote’s attitude and his superficial presentation of
certain arguments left me disappointed.
If you would like to experience another perspective on the affects of
plastic waste in the world, I recommend Waste
Land. This documentary is an account of visual artist Vik Muniz’s work with
pickers in the world’s largest landfill in Brazil. Waste Land brings a humanitarian dimension to Werner Boote’s theme.